Yalıtım Dergisi 166. Sayı (Ocak 2018)
MAKALE 54 Yalıtım / Ocak 2018 yalitim.net KAYNAKLAR 1. Stephanie Vierra, Green Building Standards and Certification Systems, LEED Ap Bd+C Vierra Design&Education Services, Llc, https://www. wbdg.org/resources/green-building-standards-and- certification-systems, 12/09/2016. 2. Kibert, C.J., Sustainable Construction: Green Building Design and Delivery, John Wiley&Sons, Fourth Edition, New Jersey, 2016. 3. Reader, L., Guide to Green Building Rating Systems, Wiley&Sons, New Jersey, 2010. 4. ÇEDBİK-KONUT Sertifikası, https://www.cedbik.org/ cedbikkonut-sertifikasi_p1_tr_44_.aspx, 18/10/2017. 5. Chethana, I.M., Illankoon, S., Tam, V.W.Y., Lee, K.N., Shen, L.,Key Credit Criteria Among International Green Building Rating Tools, Journal of Cleaner Production 164 (2017) 209-220. 6. S.H. Alyami, Y. Rezgui, Sustainable Building Assessment Tool Development Approach, Sustain. Cities Soc. 5 (2012) 52-62. 7. W. Lee, A Comprehensive Review of Metrics of Building Environmental Assessment Schemes, Energy Build. 62 (2013) 403-413. 8. L.M. Mitchell, Green Star and NABERS: Learning from the Australian Experience with Green Building Rating Tools, Energy Effic. (2010) 93. 9. X. Chen, H. Yang, L. Lu, A Comprehensive Review on Passive Design Approaches in Green Building Rating Tools, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 50 (2015) 1425e1436. 10. E. Soulti, D. Leonard, The Value of BREEAM: a Review of Latest Thinking in the Commercial Building Sector, Building Research Establishment Ltd, Watford, United Kingdom, 2016. 11. BREEAM, BREEAM Homepage, 2017. Retrieved 10 February 2017, http://www.breeam.com/. 12. C.A. Poveda, R. Young, Potential Benefits of Developing and Implementing Environmental and Sustainability Rating Systems: Making the Case for the Need of Diversification, Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 4 (2015) 1-11. 13. C. Ward, A. Yates, V. Brown, Assessing the Performance of Sustainable Buildings in China: Synergies between BREEAM and the Chinese Assessment Standard for Green Building (Three Star), Building Research Establishment Ltd, Watford, United Kingdom, 2017. 14. C. Egbu, M. Arif, M. Syal, V. Potbhare, M. Syal, M. Arif, et al., Emergence of Green Building Guidelines in Developed Countries and Their Impact on India, J. Eng. Des. Technol. 7 (2009) 99-121. 15. A. Tinker, R. Burt, Greening the Construction Curriculum, Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res. 1 (2004) 26-33. 16. Y.S. Lee, S.-K. Kim, Indoor Environmental Quality in LEED-Certified Buildings in the US, J. Asian Archit. Build. Eng. 7 (2008) 293-300. 17. A. Ofori-Boadu, D.-G. Owusu-Manu, D. Edwards, G. Holt, Exploration of Management Practices for LEED Projects: Lessons from Successful Green Building Contractors, Struct. Surv. 30 (2012) 145-162. 18. M.J. Trowbridge, K. Worden, C. Pyke, Using Green building as a Model for Making Health Promotion Standard in the Built Environment, Health Aff. 35 (2016) 2062-2067. 19. K. Kokame, More than Just a Glass Face: what Makes a” Green” or” Sustainable” Building, Exactly?, 2017. 20. S. Altomonte, S. Schiavon, Occupant Satisfaction in LEED and non-LEED Certified Buildings, Build. Environ. 68 (2013) 66-76. 21. R.J. Cole, M. Jose Valdebenito, The Importation of Building Environmental Certification Systems: International Usages of BREEAM and LEED, Build. Res. Inf. 41 (2013) 662-676. 22. CASBEE, CASBEE Homepage, 2017. Retrieved 15 April 2017, http://www.ibec. or.jp/CASBEE/english/. 23. A. Haapio, Towards Sustainable Urban Communities, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 32 (2012) 165-169. 24. DGNB Rating Toold. http://www.dgnb-system.de/en/ system/international/ 25. Mattonia, B., Guattarib, C., Evangelistib, L., Bisegnaa ,F., Gorib, P., Asdrubalib, F, Critical Review and Methodological Approach to Evaluate the Differences Among International Green Building Rating Tools, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82,1 (2018) 950-960 26. Green Globe Rating Tools. https://www.greenglobes. com/about.asp 27. ÇEDBİK-Konut sertifika sistemi. https://www.cedbik . org/dgnb_p1_tr_43_.aspx. 28. Bernardi, E., Carlucci, S., Cornaro, C., Bohne, R.A., An Analysis of the Most Adopted Rating Systems for Assessing the Environmental Impact of Buildings, Sustainability, 9( 2017), 1226.
Made with FlippingBook
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTcyMTY=